| Download a copy of this rubric by clicking on the icon |
 |
 |
|
A WebQuest Activity |
| Evaluation
Your group presentation will be evaluated, using the rubric below |
|
Adapted from Prentice Hall |
|
Names |
|
Date |
|
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
|
|
Format is easy to follow and flowed smoothly from one idea to another. | Presented in a thoughtful manner, but some things are unclear. | The ideas as good but they do not flow smoothly. | It is choppy and confusing plus difficult to follow. |
|
|
Facts are precise and explicit. | Mostly accurate with few mistakes. | Somewhat accurate with more than a few mistakes. | Whoa -- you need to go back and check your facts. |
|
|
Students found material on their own, brought in personal ideas and listed sources of in a bibliography. | Students used materials that were provided, and took some extra effort to find information outside of what was provided. | Students used the materials provided but used less than 3 resources. No outside information was included. | Students did not use the resources effectively and did no fact gathering on the topic. |
|
|
The project was clever, unique, and presented with enthusiasm. | The project was thoughtful and showed some unique qualities. | The project has some original touches. | There was little creative energy used and the project was bland. |
|
|
Engaging, interesting, and kept the audience's attention. There were a variety of visuals with color. | Well done and interesting, presented in a unique manner, well-organized, and used some visual aids. | Clear, precise, and was at times interesting. There were few visual aids. | Difficult to follow, did not keep the audience's attention, and there were no visual aids. |
| Download a copy of this rubric by clicking on the icon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
National Writing Project (NWP) at FGCU College of Education
|